Editorial standards
Editorial policy
Our job is to help a reader choose a platform—not to promise a relationship or disguise advertising as advice.
Last updated August 20, 2026Independence before monetization
Platform inclusion, category assignment, quiz eligibility and editorial quality scores are decided independently of commercial relationships. A partner may compensate us after a tracked visit, but payment does not purchase a ranking, positive verdict or exclusion of a competitor.
Tracked destination links are marked as sponsored in the page code. Comparisons also link to non-partner platforms when they are relevant to the decision.
What we use
We review official platform websites, public help and safety pages, current app-store information and our structured catalog of audience, goals, formats, markets and access models. We may consult other public sources to identify issues, but we do not copy testimonials or present anonymous reviews as verified fact.
We distinguish published claims from our editorial assessment. Member counts, prices and product features can change; readers should confirm the current offer on the destination service.
What we do not claim
A quality score is a comparison aid, not a success rate. We do not claim that we have personally used every service, verified every profile, audited private moderation systems or confirmed that a platform will be active in every city.
Health, wealth, faith, identity and lifestyle categories are handled as user-selected context, never as a diagnosis or judgment.